When A Practiced Intelligence Flush Tin Hold Out Cruel

There is an understandable vogue for Blue Planet to remove maintain slap-up involvement inward the wellness issues of our onetime national leaders.  Once they are out of office, political animosities run away, too nosotros desire to remember most them to a greater extent than equally people and, indeed, to limited our occupation concern for their well-being. That's a gracious too lovely sentiment.

A occupation tin arise, though, from the media's coverage of such a dearest figure--a vogue to overstate skilful tidings surrounding that person's medical treatment. Harold DeMonaco over at Health News Review offered an fantabulous synopsis of such coverage inward Jimmy Carter is ‘cancer free': Miracle or simply science?” from CNN, too onetime President Jimmy Carter Says He Is Free of Cancer from The New York Times.

Offering a dose of realism, Harold reminds us:

[T]he bottom line is that 18/81 subjects inward this clinical lawsuit had a answer (partial or total) that lasted from 6 to 36 weeks. Seventy-six pct did non respond. The results that Mr. Carter has achieved, unfortunately, are non necessarily instance of what the typical patient tin expect.
What’s more, equally NBC pointed out inward its coverage, there’s no agency of knowing whether it’s the drug or the radiations therapy too surgical operation that cleared all detectable traces of President Carter’s cancer. 

He concludes:

[It's] possible that some of these headlines stand upward for a willful misrepresentation of the truth past times the media inward lodge to boost readership. Nigel Hawkes, a freelance wellness reporter, hinted equally much when he spoke at  The Lancet Health of the Nation Summit inward 2009.

“It is non our labor to satisfy you lot [meaning those on the podium representing medicine] but to continue our readers reading too our viewers viewing,” he said. “The to a greater extent than responsible the press becomes, the less readers seem to similar it.”

The NPR commentary past times Barbara King referenced before should live read past times every journalist who posted a flush most Mr. Carter’s handling too past times every editor who insisted on a using a headline that did non jibe the reality.

As King, a cancer survivor, points out, the “celebratory responses built around Carter’s cancer beingness ‘gone’ are inward existent danger of swamping an accurate agreement of cancer biological scientific discipline too of what many patients sense equally they acquire by amongst cancer or cancer recovery.”

I promise that reporters too editors volition larn that a skilful tidings flush most a item celebrity tin inadvertently live a savage flush to others reading it.

Share this post