Who Allow This Through At Hbr?
Monday, November 8, 2010
Harvard Business Review online frequently has interesting as well as thoughtful pieces, but this one is then self-serving every bit to brand me gag--and wonder nearly the editorial policies that allowed its publication.
The championship seems innoucous enough--"Teaching Hospitals are the Best Place to Test Health Innovation." But this is no rigorous report or presentation of the article's premise. No, when you lot read the thing, you lot unwrap that is a paean for the Hospital for Special Surgery inwards New York City as well as for a production developed yesteryear a doc at the hospital, inwards which the infirmary presumably has a fiscal interest.
It actually would last interesting to analyze as well as exam the suggestion nearly didactics hopsitals versus non-teaching hospitals to run into where clinical excogitation is most probable to spread. But this article makes no contribution along those lines.
As a slice of earned media, it is a populace relations triumph. I only never expected HBR to last taken inwards then easily.
The championship seems innoucous enough--"Teaching Hospitals are the Best Place to Test Health Innovation." But this is no rigorous report or presentation of the article's premise. No, when you lot read the thing, you lot unwrap that is a paean for the Hospital for Special Surgery inwards New York City as well as for a production developed yesteryear a doc at the hospital, inwards which the infirmary presumably has a fiscal interest.
It actually would last interesting to analyze as well as exam the suggestion nearly didactics hopsitals versus non-teaching hospitals to run into where clinical excogitation is most probable to spread. But this article makes no contribution along those lines.
As a slice of earned media, it is a populace relations triumph. I only never expected HBR to last taken inwards then easily.