Magnetic Forces
Wednesday, September 22, 2021
A blog postal service I wrote inward 2012 nearly the lineament assertions of the Magnet recognition plan developed past times the American Nurses Credentialing Center raised the hackles of around unopen friends as well as colleagues. My point, dorsum then, was this:
So, here's the question: With all that it takes to have Magnet® status, as well as amongst all the assertions past times the ANCC nearly the superior nature of Magnetized institutions, what peer-reviewed information be that back upwards the assertion that such hospitals create inward fact deliver higher lineament patient aid than the non-Magnetic hospitals?
What prompts me to enhance the number in i lawsuit to a greater extent than is a double-full-page advert inward the Dominicus New York Times. The prominent quote:
Health aid organizations that have the prestigious accolade induce got proven that they excel at providing high-quality nursing. Magnet-recognized hospitals induce got improved patient outcomes as well as satisfaction as well as attract highly talent nurses, physicians as well as other wellness aid providers. The designation is widely considered the gilt measure of patient care.
Here's the underlying issue, concisely summarized dorsum inward 2012 past times a commenter, Dr. James O'Brien:
In add-on to the fiscal costs of completing the application as well as review procedure for this as well as other such awards, at that topographic point is a tremendous chance cost. I induce got assisted around of the nursing committees who pass considerably fourth dimension completing the application as well as review process. I wonder what the results mightiness induce got been had this fourth dimension been devoted to straightaway lineament improvement. Additionally, if an institutions chooses to prioritize these applications as well as all the same does non look to furnish the same resources as well as fourth dimension to straightaway lineament improvement, it sends a clear message to its employees nearly the truthful priorities of the organization.
Regarding the issues of the predominant association betwixt such designations as well as outcome - this would hold upwards an easier inference to brand if at that topographic point was a transparent reporting of the data. Ultimately, the costs of these applications must hold upwards paid for past times wellness aid dollars - therefore, they should induce got around semblance of cost-effectiveness - amongst an assessment that includes the man-hour costs of the application as well as review process.
I almost hesitate to state so, simply the form of claims placed inward the Magnet advert remind me of other New York Times ads, those promoting robotic surgery. There, too, assertions nearly the relative create goodness of that surgical approach induce got no documented back upwards as well as look to hold upwards designed mainly to serve every bit marketing vehicles for the hospitals mentioned.
So, here's the question: With all that it takes to have Magnet® status, as well as amongst all the assertions past times the ANCC nearly the superior nature of Magnetized institutions, what peer-reviewed information be that back upwards the assertion that such hospitals create inward fact deliver higher lineament patient aid than the non-Magnetic hospitals?
Health aid organizations that have the prestigious accolade induce got proven that they excel at providing high-quality nursing. Magnet-recognized hospitals induce got improved patient outcomes as well as satisfaction as well as attract highly talent nurses, physicians as well as other wellness aid providers. The designation is widely considered the gilt measure of patient care.
Here's the underlying issue, concisely summarized dorsum inward 2012 past times a commenter, Dr. James O'Brien:
In add-on to the fiscal costs of completing the application as well as review procedure for this as well as other such awards, at that topographic point is a tremendous chance cost. I induce got assisted around of the nursing committees who pass considerably fourth dimension completing the application as well as review process. I wonder what the results mightiness induce got been had this fourth dimension been devoted to straightaway lineament improvement. Additionally, if an institutions chooses to prioritize these applications as well as all the same does non look to furnish the same resources as well as fourth dimension to straightaway lineament improvement, it sends a clear message to its employees nearly the truthful priorities of the organization.
Regarding the issues of the predominant association betwixt such designations as well as outcome - this would hold upwards an easier inference to brand if at that topographic point was a transparent reporting of the data. Ultimately, the costs of these applications must hold upwards paid for past times wellness aid dollars - therefore, they should induce got around semblance of cost-effectiveness - amongst an assessment that includes the man-hour costs of the application as well as review process.
I almost hesitate to state so, simply the form of claims placed inward the Magnet advert remind me of other New York Times ads, those promoting robotic surgery. There, too, assertions nearly the relative create goodness of that surgical approach induce got no documented back upwards as well as look to hold upwards designed mainly to serve every bit marketing vehicles for the hospitals mentioned.