Wachter Offers The Digital Doctor
Saturday, October 20, 2018
Only a somebody with the experience, depth, too judgment of Robert Wachter could accept on the chore of summarizing the impact of the digital historic menstruum on the practise of medicine. But really few people who powerfulness get got such experience, depth, too judgment would get got pulled it off equally good equally he has.
The majority is called The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype too Harm at the Dawn of Medicine's Computer Age. It volition hold upward published inwards April, but yous tin pre-order it here, too good yous should. Bob is past times no way a Luddite, but he is also non shy inwards presenting the disadvantages of the digital age. His goal, though, is to aid us through this transition thence medicine powerfulness genuinely operate amend inwards the future.
Read the summary over at Amazon. Meanwhile, I'll laissez passer a few excerpts thence yous tin teach a feel of the marrow too style--and the majority has enough of both.
On how computers inwards the examination room tin demeanour upon the human relationship betwixt Dr. too patient, he notes that several studies get got confirmed that optic contact is associated with higher levels of perceived empathy too connection. To brand the point, he gives the counter-example:
A colleague of mine, a successful physician-entrepreneur inwards his belatedly sixties, lately told me almost a see to his principal tending Dr. afterward a long hiatus. "I had seen him a few years earlier, too I similar him," he said. "But this see was solely different. This time, he asks me a question, too equally before long equally I start out to answer, his caput is downwards inwards his laptop. Tap-tap-tap-tap-tap. He looks upward at me to enquire around other question. As before long equally I speak, in 1 lawsuit again it's tap-tap-tap-tap."
"What did yous do?" I asked.
"I constitute around other doctor."
On the final result of PACS, the computerized radiology imaging system--the starting fourth dimension widespread adoption of computers inwards medicine--which led to isolation of radiologists. Visits from other clinicians, in 1 lawsuit the norm, dropped to nothing. Indeed, interactions betwixt too with radiologists themselves did likewise.
The radiologists were lonely, sure, but their province of affairs involves something far deeper. Hari Tsoukas . . . highlights the distinction betwixt "information" too "knowledge." Information, he wrote, "consists of objectified, decontextualized, time-less, impersonal, value-free representations," whereas noesis is "context-dependent, personalized, time-bound, too infused with values." . . . The emergence of PACS left radiologists information-rich but knowledge-poor.
On the contractual concur harmless clause that exists inwards thence many EHR delineate of piece of job concern deals, rendering the companies virtually liability gratuitous fifty-fifty when their products may get got contributed to patient harm:
The vendors' instance seems similar a version of the "guns don't kill people, people kill people" argument: errors reverberate miserable implementation practices or screw-ups past times users. This is sure enough truthful at times, but . . . at that topographic point are scores of errors that are all but inevitable given clunky software, including miserable user interfaces. It seems correct that the vendors would at to the lowest degree portion responsibleness if patients were harmed inwards such circumstances.
And on the nondisclosure clauses that prohibit sharing of defects too the similar inwards information technology systems:
EHRs are non merely delineate of piece of job concern applications--they get got move the tools that nosotros purpose to accept tending of our patients. It is high fourth dimension nosotros reconciled these conflicting worldviews too threw our weight behind the transparency nosotros demand to occur patients safe.
And, spell giving slap-up credit to both organizations too their contributions to the industry, on the electrical flow schism betwixt Epic too athenahealth:
Epic too all the other vendors too providers demand to hold upward pushed toward a mutual touchstone that supports sharing, accompanied past times a laid upward of incentives too penalties to promote total connectivity. It should hold upward tardily for physicians to guide an office-based too relatively cheap EHR similar athena too get got it link upward to their hospital's Epic system, or whatever of the equivalent inpatient products. Today it is not.
And then, finally, the reconciliation betwixt humans too machines, reflecting Bob's deep noesis of clinical procedure improvement:
The stair out of a security arrangement is non whether the somebody who makes the slap-up grab gets a give cheers yous banking concern complaint from the CEO. Rather, it's whether the somebody who sees something that seems to hold upward amiss too decides to halt the delineate receives that banking concern complaint . . . when at that topographic point wasn't an error. If the arrangement is non fully supportive of that person, it volition never hold upward completely safe, no thing how adept its technology.
Bravo! Pre-order gild the majority forthwith here thence yous tin hold upward pleasantly surprised past times the package's arrival inwards Apr too thence yous tin read it before your colleagues. It volition hold upward the verbalise of the town everywhere inwards the country, too beyond.
The majority is called The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype too Harm at the Dawn of Medicine's Computer Age. It volition hold upward published inwards April, but yous tin pre-order it here, too good yous should. Bob is past times no way a Luddite, but he is also non shy inwards presenting the disadvantages of the digital age. His goal, though, is to aid us through this transition thence medicine powerfulness genuinely operate amend inwards the future.
Read the summary over at Amazon. Meanwhile, I'll laissez passer a few excerpts thence yous tin teach a feel of the marrow too style--and the majority has enough of both.
On how computers inwards the examination room tin demeanour upon the human relationship betwixt Dr. too patient, he notes that several studies get got confirmed that optic contact is associated with higher levels of perceived empathy too connection. To brand the point, he gives the counter-example:
A colleague of mine, a successful physician-entrepreneur inwards his belatedly sixties, lately told me almost a see to his principal tending Dr. afterward a long hiatus. "I had seen him a few years earlier, too I similar him," he said. "But this see was solely different. This time, he asks me a question, too equally before long equally I start out to answer, his caput is downwards inwards his laptop. Tap-tap-tap-tap-tap. He looks upward at me to enquire around other question. As before long equally I speak, in 1 lawsuit again it's tap-tap-tap-tap."
"What did yous do?" I asked.
"I constitute around other doctor."
On the final result of PACS, the computerized radiology imaging system--the starting fourth dimension widespread adoption of computers inwards medicine--which led to isolation of radiologists. Visits from other clinicians, in 1 lawsuit the norm, dropped to nothing. Indeed, interactions betwixt too with radiologists themselves did likewise.
The radiologists were lonely, sure, but their province of affairs involves something far deeper. Hari Tsoukas . . . highlights the distinction betwixt "information" too "knowledge." Information, he wrote, "consists of objectified, decontextualized, time-less, impersonal, value-free representations," whereas noesis is "context-dependent, personalized, time-bound, too infused with values." . . . The emergence of PACS left radiologists information-rich but knowledge-poor.
On the contractual concur harmless clause that exists inwards thence many EHR delineate of piece of job concern deals, rendering the companies virtually liability gratuitous fifty-fifty when their products may get got contributed to patient harm:
The vendors' instance seems similar a version of the "guns don't kill people, people kill people" argument: errors reverberate miserable implementation practices or screw-ups past times users. This is sure enough truthful at times, but . . . at that topographic point are scores of errors that are all but inevitable given clunky software, including miserable user interfaces. It seems correct that the vendors would at to the lowest degree portion responsibleness if patients were harmed inwards such circumstances.
And on the nondisclosure clauses that prohibit sharing of defects too the similar inwards information technology systems:
EHRs are non merely delineate of piece of job concern applications--they get got move the tools that nosotros purpose to accept tending of our patients. It is high fourth dimension nosotros reconciled these conflicting worldviews too threw our weight behind the transparency nosotros demand to occur patients safe.
And, spell giving slap-up credit to both organizations too their contributions to the industry, on the electrical flow schism betwixt Epic too athenahealth:
Epic too all the other vendors too providers demand to hold upward pushed toward a mutual touchstone that supports sharing, accompanied past times a laid upward of incentives too penalties to promote total connectivity. It should hold upward tardily for physicians to guide an office-based too relatively cheap EHR similar athena too get got it link upward to their hospital's Epic system, or whatever of the equivalent inpatient products. Today it is not.
And then, finally, the reconciliation betwixt humans too machines, reflecting Bob's deep noesis of clinical procedure improvement:
The stair out of a security arrangement is non whether the somebody who makes the slap-up grab gets a give cheers yous banking concern complaint from the CEO. Rather, it's whether the somebody who sees something that seems to hold upward amiss too decides to halt the delineate receives that banking concern complaint . . . when at that topographic point wasn't an error. If the arrangement is non fully supportive of that person, it volition never hold upward completely safe, no thing how adept its technology.
Bravo! Pre-order gild the majority forthwith here thence yous tin hold upward pleasantly surprised past times the package's arrival inwards Apr too thence yous tin read it before your colleagues. It volition hold upward the verbalise of the town everywhere inwards the country, too beyond.